Termination w.r.t. Q of the following Term Rewriting System could not be shown:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(U11(tt, L)) → mark(U12(tt, L))
active(U12(tt, L)) → mark(s(length(L)))
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(N, L))) → mark(U11(tt, L))
mark(zeros) → active(zeros)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(length(X)) → active(length(mark(X)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
U11(mark(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, mark(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(active(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, active(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U12(mark(X1), X2) → U12(X1, X2)
U12(X1, mark(X2)) → U12(X1, X2)
U12(active(X1), X2) → U12(X1, X2)
U12(X1, active(X2)) → U12(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)
length(active(X)) → length(X)

Q is empty.


↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(U11(tt, L)) → mark(U12(tt, L))
active(U12(tt, L)) → mark(s(length(L)))
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(N, L))) → mark(U11(tt, L))
mark(zeros) → active(zeros)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(length(X)) → active(length(mark(X)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
U11(mark(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, mark(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(active(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, active(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U12(mark(X1), X2) → U12(X1, X2)
U12(X1, mark(X2)) → U12(X1, X2)
U12(active(X1), X2) → U12(X1, X2)
U12(X1, active(X2)) → U12(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)
length(active(X)) → length(X)

Q is empty.

Using Dependency Pairs [1,15] we result in the following initial DP problem:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

CONS(mark(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(U11(tt, L)) → U121(tt, L)
MARK(tt) → ACTIVE(tt)
MARK(U11(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
CONS(X1, mark(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)
MARK(U12(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(U12(mark(X1), X2))
U121(X1, active(X2)) → U121(X1, X2)
MARK(U11(X1, X2)) → U111(mark(X1), X2)
ACTIVE(U12(tt, L)) → S(length(L))
U111(X1, mark(X2)) → U111(X1, X2)
CONS(X1, active(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)
MARK(length(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(U12(X1, X2)) → U121(mark(X1), X2)
MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(mark(X)))
ACTIVE(zeros) → CONS(0, zeros)
LENGTH(mark(X)) → LENGTH(X)
U121(active(X1), X2) → U121(X1, X2)
LENGTH(active(X)) → LENGTH(X)
ACTIVE(U12(tt, L)) → MARK(s(length(L)))
U111(X1, active(X2)) → U111(X1, X2)
U111(active(X1), X2) → U111(X1, X2)
MARK(U11(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(U11(mark(X1), X2))
S(active(X)) → S(X)
S(mark(X)) → S(X)
U121(X1, mark(X2)) → U121(X1, X2)
MARK(s(X)) → S(mark(X))
MARK(U12(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → CONS(mark(X1), X2)
ACTIVE(length(cons(N, L))) → MARK(U11(tt, L))
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(cons(mark(X1), X2))
MARK(length(X)) → ACTIVE(length(mark(X)))
ACTIVE(length(nil)) → MARK(0)
MARK(zeros) → ACTIVE(zeros)
ACTIVE(length(cons(N, L))) → U111(tt, L)
MARK(length(X)) → LENGTH(mark(X))
ACTIVE(zeros) → MARK(cons(0, zeros))
MARK(0) → ACTIVE(0)
U121(mark(X1), X2) → U121(X1, X2)
CONS(active(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
U111(mark(X1), X2) → U111(X1, X2)
MARK(nil) → ACTIVE(nil)
ACTIVE(U11(tt, L)) → MARK(U12(tt, L))
ACTIVE(U12(tt, L)) → LENGTH(L)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(U11(tt, L)) → mark(U12(tt, L))
active(U12(tt, L)) → mark(s(length(L)))
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(N, L))) → mark(U11(tt, L))
mark(zeros) → active(zeros)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(length(X)) → active(length(mark(X)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
U11(mark(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, mark(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(active(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, active(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U12(mark(X1), X2) → U12(X1, X2)
U12(X1, mark(X2)) → U12(X1, X2)
U12(active(X1), X2) → U12(X1, X2)
U12(X1, active(X2)) → U12(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)
length(active(X)) → length(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

CONS(mark(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(U11(tt, L)) → U121(tt, L)
MARK(tt) → ACTIVE(tt)
MARK(U11(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
CONS(X1, mark(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)
MARK(U12(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(U12(mark(X1), X2))
U121(X1, active(X2)) → U121(X1, X2)
MARK(U11(X1, X2)) → U111(mark(X1), X2)
ACTIVE(U12(tt, L)) → S(length(L))
U111(X1, mark(X2)) → U111(X1, X2)
CONS(X1, active(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)
MARK(length(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(U12(X1, X2)) → U121(mark(X1), X2)
MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(mark(X)))
ACTIVE(zeros) → CONS(0, zeros)
LENGTH(mark(X)) → LENGTH(X)
U121(active(X1), X2) → U121(X1, X2)
LENGTH(active(X)) → LENGTH(X)
ACTIVE(U12(tt, L)) → MARK(s(length(L)))
U111(X1, active(X2)) → U111(X1, X2)
U111(active(X1), X2) → U111(X1, X2)
MARK(U11(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(U11(mark(X1), X2))
S(active(X)) → S(X)
S(mark(X)) → S(X)
U121(X1, mark(X2)) → U121(X1, X2)
MARK(s(X)) → S(mark(X))
MARK(U12(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → CONS(mark(X1), X2)
ACTIVE(length(cons(N, L))) → MARK(U11(tt, L))
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(cons(mark(X1), X2))
MARK(length(X)) → ACTIVE(length(mark(X)))
ACTIVE(length(nil)) → MARK(0)
MARK(zeros) → ACTIVE(zeros)
ACTIVE(length(cons(N, L))) → U111(tt, L)
MARK(length(X)) → LENGTH(mark(X))
ACTIVE(zeros) → MARK(cons(0, zeros))
MARK(0) → ACTIVE(0)
U121(mark(X1), X2) → U121(X1, X2)
CONS(active(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
U111(mark(X1), X2) → U111(X1, X2)
MARK(nil) → ACTIVE(nil)
ACTIVE(U11(tt, L)) → MARK(U12(tt, L))
ACTIVE(U12(tt, L)) → LENGTH(L)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(U11(tt, L)) → mark(U12(tt, L))
active(U12(tt, L)) → mark(s(length(L)))
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(N, L))) → mark(U11(tt, L))
mark(zeros) → active(zeros)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(length(X)) → active(length(mark(X)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
U11(mark(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, mark(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(active(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, active(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U12(mark(X1), X2) → U12(X1, X2)
U12(X1, mark(X2)) → U12(X1, X2)
U12(active(X1), X2) → U12(X1, X2)
U12(X1, active(X2)) → U12(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)
length(active(X)) → length(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [15,17,22] contains 6 SCCs with 14 less nodes.

↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ DependencyGraphProof
        ↳ AND
          ↳ QDP
            ↳ QDPOrderProof
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

LENGTH(mark(X)) → LENGTH(X)
LENGTH(active(X)) → LENGTH(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(U11(tt, L)) → mark(U12(tt, L))
active(U12(tt, L)) → mark(s(length(L)))
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(N, L))) → mark(U11(tt, L))
mark(zeros) → active(zeros)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(length(X)) → active(length(mark(X)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
U11(mark(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, mark(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(active(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, active(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U12(mark(X1), X2) → U12(X1, X2)
U12(X1, mark(X2)) → U12(X1, X2)
U12(active(X1), X2) → U12(X1, X2)
U12(X1, active(X2)) → U12(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)
length(active(X)) → length(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


LENGTH(mark(X)) → LENGTH(X)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

LENGTH(active(X)) → LENGTH(X)
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(LENGTH(x1)) = (2)x_1   
POL(active(x1)) = (2)x_1   
POL(mark(x1)) = 4 + (2)x_1   
The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 8.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none



↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ DependencyGraphProof
        ↳ AND
          ↳ QDP
            ↳ QDPOrderProof
              ↳ QDP
                ↳ QDPOrderProof
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

LENGTH(active(X)) → LENGTH(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(U11(tt, L)) → mark(U12(tt, L))
active(U12(tt, L)) → mark(s(length(L)))
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(N, L))) → mark(U11(tt, L))
mark(zeros) → active(zeros)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(length(X)) → active(length(mark(X)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
U11(mark(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, mark(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(active(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, active(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U12(mark(X1), X2) → U12(X1, X2)
U12(X1, mark(X2)) → U12(X1, X2)
U12(active(X1), X2) → U12(X1, X2)
U12(X1, active(X2)) → U12(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)
length(active(X)) → length(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


LENGTH(active(X)) → LENGTH(X)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(LENGTH(x1)) = (2)x_1   
POL(active(x1)) = 4 + (4)x_1   
The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 8.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none



↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ DependencyGraphProof
        ↳ AND
          ↳ QDP
            ↳ QDPOrderProof
              ↳ QDP
                ↳ QDPOrderProof
                  ↳ QDP
                    ↳ PisEmptyProof
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(U11(tt, L)) → mark(U12(tt, L))
active(U12(tt, L)) → mark(s(length(L)))
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(N, L))) → mark(U11(tt, L))
mark(zeros) → active(zeros)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(length(X)) → active(length(mark(X)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
U11(mark(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, mark(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(active(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, active(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U12(mark(X1), X2) → U12(X1, X2)
U12(X1, mark(X2)) → U12(X1, X2)
U12(active(X1), X2) → U12(X1, X2)
U12(X1, active(X2)) → U12(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)
length(active(X)) → length(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ DependencyGraphProof
        ↳ AND
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
            ↳ QDPOrderProof
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

S(mark(X)) → S(X)
S(active(X)) → S(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(U11(tt, L)) → mark(U12(tt, L))
active(U12(tt, L)) → mark(s(length(L)))
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(N, L))) → mark(U11(tt, L))
mark(zeros) → active(zeros)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(length(X)) → active(length(mark(X)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
U11(mark(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, mark(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(active(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, active(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U12(mark(X1), X2) → U12(X1, X2)
U12(X1, mark(X2)) → U12(X1, X2)
U12(active(X1), X2) → U12(X1, X2)
U12(X1, active(X2)) → U12(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)
length(active(X)) → length(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


S(active(X)) → S(X)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

S(mark(X)) → S(X)
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(active(x1)) = 4 + (2)x_1   
POL(mark(x1)) = (2)x_1   
POL(S(x1)) = (2)x_1   
The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 8.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none



↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ DependencyGraphProof
        ↳ AND
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
            ↳ QDPOrderProof
              ↳ QDP
                ↳ QDPOrderProof
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

S(mark(X)) → S(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(U11(tt, L)) → mark(U12(tt, L))
active(U12(tt, L)) → mark(s(length(L)))
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(N, L))) → mark(U11(tt, L))
mark(zeros) → active(zeros)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(length(X)) → active(length(mark(X)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
U11(mark(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, mark(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(active(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, active(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U12(mark(X1), X2) → U12(X1, X2)
U12(X1, mark(X2)) → U12(X1, X2)
U12(active(X1), X2) → U12(X1, X2)
U12(X1, active(X2)) → U12(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)
length(active(X)) → length(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


S(mark(X)) → S(X)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(mark(x1)) = 4 + (4)x_1   
POL(S(x1)) = (2)x_1   
The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 8.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none



↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ DependencyGraphProof
        ↳ AND
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
            ↳ QDPOrderProof
              ↳ QDP
                ↳ QDPOrderProof
                  ↳ QDP
                    ↳ PisEmptyProof
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(U11(tt, L)) → mark(U12(tt, L))
active(U12(tt, L)) → mark(s(length(L)))
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(N, L))) → mark(U11(tt, L))
mark(zeros) → active(zeros)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(length(X)) → active(length(mark(X)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
U11(mark(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, mark(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(active(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, active(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U12(mark(X1), X2) → U12(X1, X2)
U12(X1, mark(X2)) → U12(X1, X2)
U12(active(X1), X2) → U12(X1, X2)
U12(X1, active(X2)) → U12(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)
length(active(X)) → length(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ DependencyGraphProof
        ↳ AND
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
            ↳ QDPOrderProof
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

U121(X1, mark(X2)) → U121(X1, X2)
U121(mark(X1), X2) → U121(X1, X2)
U121(X1, active(X2)) → U121(X1, X2)
U121(active(X1), X2) → U121(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(U11(tt, L)) → mark(U12(tt, L))
active(U12(tt, L)) → mark(s(length(L)))
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(N, L))) → mark(U11(tt, L))
mark(zeros) → active(zeros)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(length(X)) → active(length(mark(X)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
U11(mark(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, mark(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(active(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, active(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U12(mark(X1), X2) → U12(X1, X2)
U12(X1, mark(X2)) → U12(X1, X2)
U12(active(X1), X2) → U12(X1, X2)
U12(X1, active(X2)) → U12(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)
length(active(X)) → length(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


U121(X1, mark(X2)) → U121(X1, X2)
U121(X1, active(X2)) → U121(X1, X2)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

U121(mark(X1), X2) → U121(X1, X2)
U121(active(X1), X2) → U121(X1, X2)
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(active(x1)) = 1/4 + (4)x_1   
POL(U121(x1, x2)) = (1/4)x_2   
POL(mark(x1)) = 1/4 + (2)x_1   
The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 1/16.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none



↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ DependencyGraphProof
        ↳ AND
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
            ↳ QDPOrderProof
              ↳ QDP
                ↳ QDPOrderProof
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

U121(mark(X1), X2) → U121(X1, X2)
U121(active(X1), X2) → U121(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(U11(tt, L)) → mark(U12(tt, L))
active(U12(tt, L)) → mark(s(length(L)))
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(N, L))) → mark(U11(tt, L))
mark(zeros) → active(zeros)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(length(X)) → active(length(mark(X)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
U11(mark(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, mark(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(active(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, active(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U12(mark(X1), X2) → U12(X1, X2)
U12(X1, mark(X2)) → U12(X1, X2)
U12(active(X1), X2) → U12(X1, X2)
U12(X1, active(X2)) → U12(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)
length(active(X)) → length(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


U121(mark(X1), X2) → U121(X1, X2)
U121(active(X1), X2) → U121(X1, X2)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(active(x1)) = 4 + (4)x_1   
POL(U121(x1, x2)) = (4)x_1   
POL(mark(x1)) = 1 + x_1   
The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 4.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none



↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ DependencyGraphProof
        ↳ AND
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
            ↳ QDPOrderProof
              ↳ QDP
                ↳ QDPOrderProof
                  ↳ QDP
                    ↳ PisEmptyProof
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(U11(tt, L)) → mark(U12(tt, L))
active(U12(tt, L)) → mark(s(length(L)))
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(N, L))) → mark(U11(tt, L))
mark(zeros) → active(zeros)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(length(X)) → active(length(mark(X)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
U11(mark(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, mark(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(active(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, active(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U12(mark(X1), X2) → U12(X1, X2)
U12(X1, mark(X2)) → U12(X1, X2)
U12(active(X1), X2) → U12(X1, X2)
U12(X1, active(X2)) → U12(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)
length(active(X)) → length(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ DependencyGraphProof
        ↳ AND
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
            ↳ QDPOrderProof
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

U111(X1, mark(X2)) → U111(X1, X2)
U111(X1, active(X2)) → U111(X1, X2)
U111(active(X1), X2) → U111(X1, X2)
U111(mark(X1), X2) → U111(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(U11(tt, L)) → mark(U12(tt, L))
active(U12(tt, L)) → mark(s(length(L)))
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(N, L))) → mark(U11(tt, L))
mark(zeros) → active(zeros)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(length(X)) → active(length(mark(X)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
U11(mark(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, mark(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(active(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, active(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U12(mark(X1), X2) → U12(X1, X2)
U12(X1, mark(X2)) → U12(X1, X2)
U12(active(X1), X2) → U12(X1, X2)
U12(X1, active(X2)) → U12(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)
length(active(X)) → length(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


U111(X1, mark(X2)) → U111(X1, X2)
U111(X1, active(X2)) → U111(X1, X2)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

U111(active(X1), X2) → U111(X1, X2)
U111(mark(X1), X2) → U111(X1, X2)
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(active(x1)) = 1/4 + (2)x_1   
POL(U111(x1, x2)) = (1/4)x_2   
POL(mark(x1)) = 4 + (2)x_1   
The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 1/16.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none



↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ DependencyGraphProof
        ↳ AND
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
            ↳ QDPOrderProof
              ↳ QDP
                ↳ QDPOrderProof
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

U111(active(X1), X2) → U111(X1, X2)
U111(mark(X1), X2) → U111(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(U11(tt, L)) → mark(U12(tt, L))
active(U12(tt, L)) → mark(s(length(L)))
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(N, L))) → mark(U11(tt, L))
mark(zeros) → active(zeros)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(length(X)) → active(length(mark(X)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
U11(mark(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, mark(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(active(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, active(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U12(mark(X1), X2) → U12(X1, X2)
U12(X1, mark(X2)) → U12(X1, X2)
U12(active(X1), X2) → U12(X1, X2)
U12(X1, active(X2)) → U12(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)
length(active(X)) → length(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


U111(active(X1), X2) → U111(X1, X2)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

U111(mark(X1), X2) → U111(X1, X2)
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(active(x1)) = 4 + (2)x_1   
POL(U111(x1, x2)) = (2)x_1   
POL(mark(x1)) = (2)x_1   
The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 8.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none



↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ DependencyGraphProof
        ↳ AND
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
            ↳ QDPOrderProof
              ↳ QDP
                ↳ QDPOrderProof
                  ↳ QDP
                    ↳ QDPOrderProof
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

U111(mark(X1), X2) → U111(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(U11(tt, L)) → mark(U12(tt, L))
active(U12(tt, L)) → mark(s(length(L)))
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(N, L))) → mark(U11(tt, L))
mark(zeros) → active(zeros)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(length(X)) → active(length(mark(X)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
U11(mark(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, mark(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(active(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, active(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U12(mark(X1), X2) → U12(X1, X2)
U12(X1, mark(X2)) → U12(X1, X2)
U12(active(X1), X2) → U12(X1, X2)
U12(X1, active(X2)) → U12(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)
length(active(X)) → length(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


U111(mark(X1), X2) → U111(X1, X2)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(U111(x1, x2)) = (2)x_1   
POL(mark(x1)) = 4 + (4)x_1   
The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 8.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none



↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ DependencyGraphProof
        ↳ AND
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
            ↳ QDPOrderProof
              ↳ QDP
                ↳ QDPOrderProof
                  ↳ QDP
                    ↳ QDPOrderProof
                      ↳ QDP
                        ↳ PisEmptyProof
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(U11(tt, L)) → mark(U12(tt, L))
active(U12(tt, L)) → mark(s(length(L)))
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(N, L))) → mark(U11(tt, L))
mark(zeros) → active(zeros)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(length(X)) → active(length(mark(X)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
U11(mark(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, mark(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(active(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, active(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U12(mark(X1), X2) → U12(X1, X2)
U12(X1, mark(X2)) → U12(X1, X2)
U12(active(X1), X2) → U12(X1, X2)
U12(X1, active(X2)) → U12(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)
length(active(X)) → length(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ DependencyGraphProof
        ↳ AND
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
            ↳ QDPOrderProof
          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

CONS(X1, active(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(mark(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(active(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(X1, mark(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(U11(tt, L)) → mark(U12(tt, L))
active(U12(tt, L)) → mark(s(length(L)))
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(N, L))) → mark(U11(tt, L))
mark(zeros) → active(zeros)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(length(X)) → active(length(mark(X)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
U11(mark(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, mark(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(active(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, active(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U12(mark(X1), X2) → U12(X1, X2)
U12(X1, mark(X2)) → U12(X1, X2)
U12(active(X1), X2) → U12(X1, X2)
U12(X1, active(X2)) → U12(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)
length(active(X)) → length(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


CONS(X1, active(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(X1, mark(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

CONS(mark(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(active(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(active(x1)) = 4 + (2)x_1   
POL(CONS(x1, x2)) = (1/4)x_2   
POL(mark(x1)) = 1/4 + (2)x_1   
The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 1/16.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none



↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ DependencyGraphProof
        ↳ AND
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
            ↳ QDPOrderProof
              ↳ QDP
                ↳ QDPOrderProof
          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

CONS(mark(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(active(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(U11(tt, L)) → mark(U12(tt, L))
active(U12(tt, L)) → mark(s(length(L)))
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(N, L))) → mark(U11(tt, L))
mark(zeros) → active(zeros)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(length(X)) → active(length(mark(X)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
U11(mark(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, mark(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(active(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, active(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U12(mark(X1), X2) → U12(X1, X2)
U12(X1, mark(X2)) → U12(X1, X2)
U12(active(X1), X2) → U12(X1, X2)
U12(X1, active(X2)) → U12(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)
length(active(X)) → length(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


CONS(active(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

CONS(mark(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(active(x1)) = 4 + (2)x_1   
POL(CONS(x1, x2)) = (2)x_1   
POL(mark(x1)) = (2)x_1   
The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 8.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none



↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ DependencyGraphProof
        ↳ AND
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
            ↳ QDPOrderProof
              ↳ QDP
                ↳ QDPOrderProof
                  ↳ QDP
                    ↳ QDPOrderProof
          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

CONS(mark(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(U11(tt, L)) → mark(U12(tt, L))
active(U12(tt, L)) → mark(s(length(L)))
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(N, L))) → mark(U11(tt, L))
mark(zeros) → active(zeros)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(length(X)) → active(length(mark(X)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
U11(mark(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, mark(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(active(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, active(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U12(mark(X1), X2) → U12(X1, X2)
U12(X1, mark(X2)) → U12(X1, X2)
U12(active(X1), X2) → U12(X1, X2)
U12(X1, active(X2)) → U12(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)
length(active(X)) → length(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


CONS(mark(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(CONS(x1, x2)) = (1/4)x_1   
POL(mark(x1)) = 1/4 + (2)x_1   
The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 1/16.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none



↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ DependencyGraphProof
        ↳ AND
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
            ↳ QDPOrderProof
              ↳ QDP
                ↳ QDPOrderProof
                  ↳ QDP
                    ↳ QDPOrderProof
                      ↳ QDP
                        ↳ PisEmptyProof
          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(U11(tt, L)) → mark(U12(tt, L))
active(U12(tt, L)) → mark(s(length(L)))
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(N, L))) → mark(U11(tt, L))
mark(zeros) → active(zeros)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(length(X)) → active(length(mark(X)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
U11(mark(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, mark(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(active(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, active(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U12(mark(X1), X2) → U12(X1, X2)
U12(X1, mark(X2)) → U12(X1, X2)
U12(active(X1), X2) → U12(X1, X2)
U12(X1, active(X2)) → U12(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)
length(active(X)) → length(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ DependencyGraphProof
        ↳ AND
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
            ↳ QDPOrderProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(U11(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(U11(mark(X1), X2))
MARK(U12(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(U11(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(length(cons(N, L))) → MARK(U11(tt, L))
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(cons(mark(X1), X2))
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(U12(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(U12(mark(X1), X2))
MARK(length(X)) → ACTIVE(length(mark(X)))
MARK(length(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(zeros) → ACTIVE(zeros)
MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(mark(X)))
ACTIVE(zeros) → MARK(cons(0, zeros))
ACTIVE(U11(tt, L)) → MARK(U12(tt, L))
ACTIVE(U12(tt, L)) → MARK(s(length(L)))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(U11(tt, L)) → mark(U12(tt, L))
active(U12(tt, L)) → mark(s(length(L)))
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(N, L))) → mark(U11(tt, L))
mark(zeros) → active(zeros)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(length(X)) → active(length(mark(X)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
U11(mark(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, mark(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(active(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, active(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U12(mark(X1), X2) → U12(X1, X2)
U12(X1, mark(X2)) → U12(X1, X2)
U12(active(X1), X2) → U12(X1, X2)
U12(X1, active(X2)) → U12(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)
length(active(X)) → length(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(cons(mark(X1), X2))
MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(mark(X)))
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

MARK(U11(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(U11(mark(X1), X2))
MARK(U12(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(U11(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(length(cons(N, L))) → MARK(U11(tt, L))
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(U12(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(U12(mark(X1), X2))
MARK(length(X)) → ACTIVE(length(mark(X)))
MARK(length(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(zeros) → ACTIVE(zeros)
ACTIVE(zeros) → MARK(cons(0, zeros))
ACTIVE(U11(tt, L)) → MARK(U12(tt, L))
ACTIVE(U12(tt, L)) → MARK(s(length(L)))
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(mark(x1)) = 0   
POL(U12(x1, x2)) = 1   
POL(U11(x1, x2)) = 1   
POL(0) = 0   
POL(ACTIVE(x1)) = (1/4)x_1   
POL(cons(x1, x2)) = 1/4   
POL(active(x1)) = 0   
POL(MARK(x1)) = 1/4   
POL(tt) = 0   
POL(zeros) = 1   
POL(s(x1)) = 0   
POL(length(x1)) = 1   
POL(nil) = 0   
The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 3/16.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented:

U12(mark(X1), X2) → U12(X1, X2)
U12(active(X1), X2) → U12(X1, X2)
U12(X1, active(X2)) → U12(X1, X2)
U12(X1, mark(X2)) → U12(X1, X2)
U11(mark(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(active(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, active(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, mark(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
length(active(X)) → length(X)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)



↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ DependencyGraphProof
        ↳ AND
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
            ↳ QDPOrderProof
              ↳ QDP
                ↳ QDPOrderProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(U11(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(U11(mark(X1), X2))
MARK(U12(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(U11(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(length(cons(N, L))) → MARK(U11(tt, L))
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(U12(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(U12(mark(X1), X2))
MARK(length(X)) → ACTIVE(length(mark(X)))
MARK(length(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(zeros) → ACTIVE(zeros)
ACTIVE(zeros) → MARK(cons(0, zeros))
ACTIVE(U11(tt, L)) → MARK(U12(tt, L))
ACTIVE(U12(tt, L)) → MARK(s(length(L)))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(U11(tt, L)) → mark(U12(tt, L))
active(U12(tt, L)) → mark(s(length(L)))
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(N, L))) → mark(U11(tt, L))
mark(zeros) → active(zeros)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(length(X)) → active(length(mark(X)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
U11(mark(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, mark(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(active(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, active(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U12(mark(X1), X2) → U12(X1, X2)
U12(X1, mark(X2)) → U12(X1, X2)
U12(active(X1), X2) → U12(X1, X2)
U12(X1, active(X2)) → U12(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)
length(active(X)) → length(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


MARK(U12(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(U11(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(length(X)) → MARK(X)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

MARK(U11(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(U11(mark(X1), X2))
ACTIVE(length(cons(N, L))) → MARK(U11(tt, L))
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(U12(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(U12(mark(X1), X2))
MARK(length(X)) → ACTIVE(length(mark(X)))
MARK(zeros) → ACTIVE(zeros)
ACTIVE(zeros) → MARK(cons(0, zeros))
ACTIVE(U11(tt, L)) → MARK(U12(tt, L))
ACTIVE(U12(tt, L)) → MARK(s(length(L)))
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(mark(x1)) = x_1   
POL(U12(x1, x2)) = 1/4 + x_1 + (4)x_2   
POL(U11(x1, x2)) = 1/4 + (2)x_1 + (4)x_2   
POL(0) = 0   
POL(ACTIVE(x1)) = (1/4)x_1   
POL(cons(x1, x2)) = x_1 + (4)x_2   
POL(active(x1)) = x_1   
POL(MARK(x1)) = (1/4)x_1   
POL(tt) = 0   
POL(zeros) = 0   
POL(s(x1)) = x_1   
POL(length(x1)) = 1/4 + (2)x_1   
POL(nil) = 0   
The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 1/16.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented:

U12(mark(X1), X2) → U12(X1, X2)
U12(active(X1), X2) → U12(X1, X2)
U12(X1, active(X2)) → U12(X1, X2)
U12(X1, mark(X2)) → U12(X1, X2)
U11(mark(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(active(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, active(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, mark(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
length(active(X)) → length(X)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(length(X)) → active(length(mark(X)))
active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
mark(zeros) → active(zeros)
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(U12(X1, X2)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
active(U12(tt, L)) → mark(s(length(L)))
active(U11(tt, L)) → mark(U12(tt, L))
active(length(cons(N, L))) → mark(U11(tt, L))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)



↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ DependencyGraphProof
        ↳ AND
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
            ↳ QDPOrderProof
              ↳ QDP
                ↳ QDPOrderProof
                  ↳ QDP
                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(U11(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(U11(mark(X1), X2))
ACTIVE(length(cons(N, L))) → MARK(U11(tt, L))
MARK(zeros) → ACTIVE(zeros)
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
ACTIVE(zeros) → MARK(cons(0, zeros))
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(U12(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(U12(mark(X1), X2))
MARK(length(X)) → ACTIVE(length(mark(X)))
ACTIVE(U11(tt, L)) → MARK(U12(tt, L))
ACTIVE(U12(tt, L)) → MARK(s(length(L)))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(U11(tt, L)) → mark(U12(tt, L))
active(U12(tt, L)) → mark(s(length(L)))
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(N, L))) → mark(U11(tt, L))
mark(zeros) → active(zeros)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(length(X)) → active(length(mark(X)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
U11(mark(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, mark(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(active(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, active(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U12(mark(X1), X2) → U12(X1, X2)
U12(X1, mark(X2)) → U12(X1, X2)
U12(active(X1), X2) → U12(X1, X2)
U12(X1, active(X2)) → U12(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)
length(active(X)) → length(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


MARK(zeros) → ACTIVE(zeros)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

MARK(U11(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(U11(mark(X1), X2))
ACTIVE(length(cons(N, L))) → MARK(U11(tt, L))
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
ACTIVE(zeros) → MARK(cons(0, zeros))
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(U12(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(U12(mark(X1), X2))
MARK(length(X)) → ACTIVE(length(mark(X)))
ACTIVE(U11(tt, L)) → MARK(U12(tt, L))
ACTIVE(U12(tt, L)) → MARK(s(length(L)))
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(mark(x1)) = x_1   
POL(U12(x1, x2)) = 0   
POL(U11(x1, x2)) = 0   
POL(0) = 0   
POL(ACTIVE(x1)) = 0   
POL(cons(x1, x2)) = x_1   
POL(active(x1)) = x_1   
POL(MARK(x1)) = (4)x_1   
POL(tt) = 0   
POL(zeros) = 1/2   
POL(s(x1)) = x_1   
POL(length(x1)) = 0   
POL(nil) = 0   
The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 2.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented:

U12(mark(X1), X2) → U12(X1, X2)
U12(active(X1), X2) → U12(X1, X2)
U12(X1, active(X2)) → U12(X1, X2)
U12(X1, mark(X2)) → U12(X1, X2)
U11(mark(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(active(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, active(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, mark(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
length(active(X)) → length(X)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)



↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ DependencyGraphProof
        ↳ AND
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
            ↳ QDPOrderProof
              ↳ QDP
                ↳ QDPOrderProof
                  ↳ QDP
                    ↳ QDPOrderProof
                      ↳ QDP
                        ↳ DependencyGraphProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(U11(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(U11(mark(X1), X2))
ACTIVE(length(cons(N, L))) → MARK(U11(tt, L))
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
ACTIVE(zeros) → MARK(cons(0, zeros))
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(U12(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(U12(mark(X1), X2))
MARK(length(X)) → ACTIVE(length(mark(X)))
ACTIVE(U11(tt, L)) → MARK(U12(tt, L))
ACTIVE(U12(tt, L)) → MARK(s(length(L)))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(U11(tt, L)) → mark(U12(tt, L))
active(U12(tt, L)) → mark(s(length(L)))
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(N, L))) → mark(U11(tt, L))
mark(zeros) → active(zeros)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(length(X)) → active(length(mark(X)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
U11(mark(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, mark(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(active(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, active(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U12(mark(X1), X2) → U12(X1, X2)
U12(X1, mark(X2)) → U12(X1, X2)
U12(active(X1), X2) → U12(X1, X2)
U12(X1, active(X2)) → U12(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)
length(active(X)) → length(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [15,17,22] contains 1 SCC with 1 less node.

↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ DependencyGraphProof
        ↳ AND
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
            ↳ QDPOrderProof
              ↳ QDP
                ↳ QDPOrderProof
                  ↳ QDP
                    ↳ QDPOrderProof
                      ↳ QDP
                        ↳ DependencyGraphProof
                          ↳ QDP
                            ↳ QDPOrderProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(U11(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(U11(mark(X1), X2))
ACTIVE(length(cons(N, L))) → MARK(U11(tt, L))
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(U12(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(U12(mark(X1), X2))
MARK(length(X)) → ACTIVE(length(mark(X)))
ACTIVE(U11(tt, L)) → MARK(U12(tt, L))
ACTIVE(U12(tt, L)) → MARK(s(length(L)))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(U11(tt, L)) → mark(U12(tt, L))
active(U12(tt, L)) → mark(s(length(L)))
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(N, L))) → mark(U11(tt, L))
mark(zeros) → active(zeros)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(length(X)) → active(length(mark(X)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
U11(mark(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, mark(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(active(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, active(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U12(mark(X1), X2) → U12(X1, X2)
U12(X1, mark(X2)) → U12(X1, X2)
U12(active(X1), X2) → U12(X1, X2)
U12(X1, active(X2)) → U12(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)
length(active(X)) → length(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

MARK(U11(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(U11(mark(X1), X2))
ACTIVE(length(cons(N, L))) → MARK(U11(tt, L))
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(U12(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(U12(mark(X1), X2))
MARK(length(X)) → ACTIVE(length(mark(X)))
ACTIVE(U11(tt, L)) → MARK(U12(tt, L))
ACTIVE(U12(tt, L)) → MARK(s(length(L)))
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(mark(x1)) = (4)x_1   
POL(U12(x1, x2)) = 0   
POL(U11(x1, x2)) = 0   
POL(0) = 0   
POL(ACTIVE(x1)) = 0   
POL(cons(x1, x2)) = 1/4 + (4)x_1 + (4)x_2   
POL(active(x1)) = x_1   
POL(MARK(x1)) = (1/4)x_1   
POL(tt) = 0   
POL(zeros) = 0   
POL(s(x1)) = (4)x_1   
POL(length(x1)) = 0   
POL(nil) = 0   
The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 1/16.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented:

U12(mark(X1), X2) → U12(X1, X2)
U12(active(X1), X2) → U12(X1, X2)
U12(X1, active(X2)) → U12(X1, X2)
U12(X1, mark(X2)) → U12(X1, X2)
U11(mark(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(active(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, active(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, mark(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
length(active(X)) → length(X)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)



↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ DependencyGraphProof
        ↳ AND
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
            ↳ QDPOrderProof
              ↳ QDP
                ↳ QDPOrderProof
                  ↳ QDP
                    ↳ QDPOrderProof
                      ↳ QDP
                        ↳ DependencyGraphProof
                          ↳ QDP
                            ↳ QDPOrderProof
                              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(U11(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(U11(mark(X1), X2))
ACTIVE(length(cons(N, L))) → MARK(U11(tt, L))
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(U12(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(U12(mark(X1), X2))
MARK(length(X)) → ACTIVE(length(mark(X)))
ACTIVE(U11(tt, L)) → MARK(U12(tt, L))
ACTIVE(U12(tt, L)) → MARK(s(length(L)))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(U11(tt, L)) → mark(U12(tt, L))
active(U12(tt, L)) → mark(s(length(L)))
active(length(nil)) → mark(0)
active(length(cons(N, L))) → mark(U11(tt, L))
mark(zeros) → active(zeros)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(U11(X1, X2)) → active(U11(mark(X1), X2))
mark(tt) → active(tt)
mark(U12(X1, X2)) → active(U12(mark(X1), X2))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(length(X)) → active(length(mark(X)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
U11(mark(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, mark(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(active(X1), X2) → U11(X1, X2)
U11(X1, active(X2)) → U11(X1, X2)
U12(mark(X1), X2) → U12(X1, X2)
U12(X1, mark(X2)) → U12(X1, X2)
U12(active(X1), X2) → U12(X1, X2)
U12(X1, active(X2)) → U12(X1, X2)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
length(mark(X)) → length(X)
length(active(X)) → length(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.